R&D incentive review flags cuts and boosts – your views are needed

tax_incentive

The Federal Government has released the report of its review into the R&D Tax Incentive, which recommends cuts in some parts and boosts in others, and is seeking industry feedback before making final decisions. The recommendations include:

  • adding a new premium level of incentive for R&D where businesses collaborate with publicly-funded research organisations like CSIRO and the universities, raising the non-refundable tax offset from 40 cents on the dollar of R&D expenditure to up to 60 cents;
  • capping at $2 million the level of refunds that SMEs can claim under the R&D Tax Incentive;
  • using an ‘R&D intensity threshold” to limit the existing non-refundable incentive, which would apply only to R&D spending above a minimum threshold of total business costs. The threshold might be set between 1% to 2%; and
  • clarifying the meaning of the existing rules around eligible expenditure and other matters, so as to reduce uncertainty and costs for auditing and administration.

If implemented these changes would have both costs and benefits for innovation active businesses. Our initial reaction to the report is that while the changes deserve consideration on their merits, the Incentive has already been subject to too much change and returning to stability is important – see our full response here.

Ai Group is preparing a submission to the Government on the proposals and is keen to hear from members about your views. Please contact Ai Group adviser Tennant Reed, Tel: 03 9867 0145, to provide your input. 

The following two tabs change content below.
Tennant Reed
Tennant is Principal National Adviser – Public Policy at Ai Group. He has worked heavily on climate and energy issues, advising Ai Group’s Leaders’ Group on Energy and Climate Policy and developing reports on natural gas supply, energy prices and energy efficiency. He also works on a range of issues related to manufacturing and innovation. Previously he was an adviser in the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet, working on fiscal policy, stimulus and infrastructure.

1 Comment

  1. Martin Harland

    The R&D concessions for business is a joke. We employ a full time engineer solely to develop new products and we don’t qualify to claim, because we’re not “generating new knowledge”. Yet another example of both major parties failing small and medium sized businesses

    Reply

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>