Ai Group has successfully represented a member company in a dispute with the ATO over the meaning of Ordinary Time Earnings (OTE) for superannuation purposes – an issue with the potential to have significant financial consequences for many businesses.
The ATO issued binding advice that the company was required to make superannuation contributions on the basis of 56 hours per week, including 18 hours of regular overtime that was built into the roster and which was compensated for by a higher (loaded hourly) rate.
On behalf of the company, Ai Group applied to have the original advice reviewed, but the ATO confirmed its original advice.
We then took the matter up at a higher level within the ATO. Following the second review of the original advice, the ATO has now confirmed that they agree with our view that superannuation is only payable on 38 ordinary hours, not 56 hours. An important factor was that the industrial instrument drew a genuine distinction between ordinary hours and other hours. The following extract from the ATO advice is relevant:
“……the relevant award or agreement must draw a genuine distinction between ordinary hours and other hours. Furthermore, it is expected that these other hours, typically described as overtime, are remunerated at a higher rate of pay than the ordinary hours or are otherwise identifiable as a separate component of the total pay in respect of non-ordinary hours.”
This issue has some similarities with the debate which occurred between Ai Group and the ATO in 2008 and 2009 when Superannuation Guarantee Ruling SGR 2009/2 – Meaning of the terms ‘ordinary time earnings’ and ‘salary or wages’ was being developed. Ai Group successfully fought to ensure that employers were not forced to pay superannuation on overtime earnings. At the time, industry was potentially faced with billions of dollars per year of additional costs.
This is an important issue for employers to bear in mind when drafting or reviewing enterprise agreements or employment contracts. If the agreement includes a roster which incorporates regular overtime, or if the agreement requires a specified number of additional hours to be regularly worked, the agreement should separately identify the ordinary hours and the overtime hours.
If the agreement or contract is poorly drafted, there is the risk that superannuation may be payable on the additional hours. There will also be potentially costly implications for other entitlements such as annual leave accruals, personal/carer’s leave accruals and public holidays, among other things.
Is this an issue that has confronted your business? Tell us more below.
Latest posts by Stephen Smith (see all)
- What’s going on with all these public holidays? - 29 November, 2016
- Prospect for passage of ABCC Bill in Federal Parliament - 31 August, 2016
- Casual Case Full Bench to decide if casual service counts in redundancy calculations - 24 August, 2016